The Deakin Centre for Quality and Risk Management in Health: A Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centre

Systematic Reviews

Systematic reviews are a comprehensive survey of a focussed question in which all of the primary studies of the highest level of evidence are systematically identified, appraised and then summarized according to an explicit and reproducible methodology. Systematic reviews differ from traditional reviews and commentaries produced by ‘content experts’ in that they adhere to a scientific methodology which seeks to minimise bias and errors.

The Systematic Review Team from the Centre is involved in carrying out a number of systematic reviews using the JBI methodology. These are set out as below.

 Title

 Review Team

 Protocol Number

Status 

End Date 

A systematic review of the effectiveness of current interventions to assist adults with heart failure to comply with therapy and enhance self-care behaviours.
Kent B, Cull E, Phillips N
First published:04 Dec 2011; 9(59): 2572-2626
Download PDF

Emily Cull, Nikki Phillips, Bridie Kent

  SR364

Review completed; published in JBI Library of Systematic reviews.

 January 2011

Post-anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: A systematic review
Phillips N , Haesler E, Street M, Kent B
First published:04 Aug 2011; 9(41): 1679-1713 Download PDF

Nikki Phillips, Emily Haesler, Maryann Street, Bridie Kent

SR395

Review completed; published in JBI Library of Systematic reviews.

 June 2011

Use of mobility subscale for risk assessment of pressure ulcer incidence and preventive interventions: A systematic review
Mordiffi S, Kent B, Phillips N, Tho P
First published:20 Nov 2011; 9(56): 2417-2481
Download PDF

Siti Zubaidah Mordiffi, Poh Chi Tho, Bridie Kent, Nikki Phillips

 SR393

 Review completed; published in JBI Library of Systematic reviews.

  October 2011

The systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of telephone pre-operative assessment for adults

Susan Ireland, Bridie Kent

SR417  

Review completed

 October 2011

Nurses’ experiences of ethical preparedness for catastrophic public health emergencies and health care disasters; a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Megan-Jane Johnstone and Sue Turale

PRO494 Protocol approved, review in progress  April 2012
The experience of new mothers who are separated from their newborn infants: a qualitative systematic review Sara Stelfox and Cate Nagle. PRO490 Protocol approved, review in progress March 2012

 

 

 

Deakin University acknowledges the traditional land owners of present campus sites.

21st May 2012