| An Interview with Rodney Carr |
| (“Inter” refers to the interviewer, “Carr”
refers to Rodney Carr) |
| Inter: |
Rodney we hear a lot about road mapping
in the political domain in regard to road mapping options for peace
in the Middle East. It's really quite intriguing to think
about the concept of road mapping as being applied to improving
teaching and learning in higher education. So to begin with I just
wonder whether you could explain to me what is road mapping as a
concept? |
| Carr: |
Ah, now that's a very interesting, ah, road
mapping, like road mapping for the Middle East and it's ah,
I don't think the English language has got a particularly
good word for this, is the problem. The closest, the generic term
for road mapping for units is really concept mapping. It's
a form of concept mapping. I should have called it concept mapping
in the beginning probably, but ah, you know, I don't know,
I just called it road mapping. There's no good reason for
it, it's just a form of concept mapping and it ah. |
| Inter: |
It sort of catches the attention and you talk about
it really being concept mapping, yet, what is the educational value
of mapping concepts to understand the knowledge of a unit, a discipline,
better, from a teaching and learning perspective? |
| Carr: |
All concept maps have got the same sort of idea behind
them. You start out with the big picture, right, big picture and
ah, you drill, you allow students to see the overall structure of
what you want to present broken down, it's just like a regular
text book, that's kind of split into topics, you know, topic
1, topic 2, dit, dit, dit, all the way through. Road maps are just,
that's a way of showing general information structure. Concept
maps just present that usually in a hierarchical view, rather than
a linear view. But it's the same sort of idea, ah, it's
just a different way of presenting it. They're usually more
visual which is appealing to students, particularly students that
are used to playing games, they click on things, so. Concept maps
usually are drawn on bits of paper with circles. The e-road mappings,
road mappings is done with Power Point. There's tools provided
to allow you to, basically a slide is a concept and you can link
concepts together to form bigger concepts and themes and topics
and units and courses, all the way up if you wanted to |
| Inter: |
It seems to me, it's very challenging in regard
to people having a very clear understanding of the way the knowledge
of their subject is structured and organised.
Now some subjects probably lend themselves incredibly well to that.
They've got a well articulated, logical knowledge base. Maybe
other subjects are more problematic in that regard but obviously
whatever way you look at it you've got to have a very clear
view of the way knowledge is created and best presented in the discipline
to do it well. |
| Carr: |
Yes you have got to be a real expert in your area,
domain expert and you've really got to know your stuff to
be able to do one as a staff member, as an academic.
You can get help. Ah. Good interviewers, in fact it's one
of the questions you've got down here later. Good interview
skills can help staff to extract the themes. You can start out with,
well, a structure in a text book, you can start out, or a usual
set of Power Point slides given to you by a publisher or that was
left over from the last person that taught it or when you taught
it last time. You can use that to start pulling together themes
and concepts and produce a concept map out of those, say, ordinary
old lecture slides, linked together into concepts and themes and
work your way up to build a map out of it. There's a couple
of ways of building these things. That's one way, starting
from the bottom and building your concepts and themes up. And you
have to know what you're doing. You have to be a real expert
to answer, to go back to your question. And, that's, but you
can get help. |
| Inter: |
Do you think too, Rodney, that it's a good
vehicle for developing teacher expertise and understanding the subject,
to be involved in this? |
| Carr: |
I don't know. Not sure. |
| Inter: |
Or do you really need to start with a fairly good
knowledge of the subject to do it well? |
| Carr: |
I've seen. Yeah. I haven't really tried
that. It's not, it wasn't my aim. I think the aim really
is to start out with somebody that knows what they're doing
and do it and one of the… It's really somebody's
mind map of the subject, of the unit that they're teaching.
If you go in, it's somebody's mind, they have got to
have the map there, kind of in place, they discover it and they
are not always clear what the structure is in their head and they
will invent it as they're going along and they will figure
out, they will try one structure and say that's not right
and then move things around, move the concepts around, regroup them.
Ah. It's an iterative process. You can do it fairly quickly
to come out with a structure but it, ah, you see people discovering
it, the structure on the fly, but I think you've got to have
the knowledge to begin with. For students; it's I don't
really know, I'm a bit worried that what you, for first year
students, you give them, we are giving them a map and that makes
sense. You give them a structure of the unit coming from somebody's
head, that they might have discovered as they're making it.
So people put, a staff member puts together a mind map of how they
see the unit fit in. We are giving that to students and saying,
here is a structure for this whole unit. That's alright for
first year students, probably for undergraduates but for postgraduates
at least, I think you want them to do their own mapping. Now that's,
I've seen this, I've seen that being used in this way
for PhD, structuring PhD's. Now that's clearly somebody
discovering and structuring information for themselves. They have
got some data and now they're trying to structure their thesis
out. And this sort of mapping, of concept mapping at that level
is really a way of discovering knowledge. |
| Inter: |
Rodney we can probably all recollect working in unit
teams doing distance learning print material and as you said people
trying to concept map the structure and organisation of their material
with pieces of paper and on a white board, using the more traditional
media. Now you put the 'e' in front of road mapping,
so it's e-road mapping, electronic road mapping, you're
really talking about creating and presenting this type of concept
mapping in electronic or digital form. What's the value in
doing that, moving to an electronic environment and an e-tool to
do it? |
| Carr: |
That, what you described, doing on the white board
that's not available for students. This makes it available
for students and there are plenty of electronic concept mapping
tools around, that Inspiration is one of them, for example. They're
not available for students either. They're to help people.
They're to replace the white board, that's all they're
there for. You don't produce a concept map and then give it
to your students using Inspiration. Well I suppose you could, but
that's not what people use it for. The e in front, I could
be using Inspiration but this one's using Power Point and
that's on everybody's desk. Everybody's familiar
with it, students are familiar with it, we all know how to drive
Power Point to some extent and it's on our desks, it's
on our computer. It's just a little step to, all it's
doing, it's really simple. Every slide in Power Point becomes
a theme and well instead of going page down, page down, next slide,
next slide, working through it linearly, you put a hypertext, it's
visual, so you make another. If three slides are in a little series
but they're all about the same theme, about the same concept.
They are all about ah, okay, what I did yesterday, computer hardware.
So there is a series of slides. This is really simple. Four or five,
it might have been six actually. Six slides on different aspects
of computer hardware and they were say, input devices, all right.
So oh, they're all about input devices. So you make another
parent slide of all of those 6 input devices slides, you make another
parent of all of those and you put an image of each one of the babies,
the child slides on the parent, make them hyperlink, so you can
click on the hyperlink on the parent and it takes you to the child.
You have got to have navigation to get back so you add a little
up button, back button on each slide so you can go back to the parent
and to the parent's grandparent and work your way back up
the tree that way. I did have up-layered other structures. Concept
maps are usually done hierarchically like that. You can have other
structures. Hyperlinks really. Old Hypercard, remember Hypercard,
it's a bit like that. |
| Inter: |
What was the genesis of this Rodney? I mean…You
sat there one day, the light bulb came on metaphorically. You saw
Power Point, something triggered off something to do with concept
mapping. You were looking at print material. You went, I need an
e road mapping tool. I can create one. I can see the benefit and
then it all moved into this first year unit, Business Information
Systems, that kind of unit. |
| Carr: |
It actually started before that. That was the second
one. The first one, remember, you might not have known, remember
I ran this thing called Stats in a Day workshop. I still get queries
for it but I just can't run it anymore, I don't get
the time. What I did there was teaching basic first year stats in
a day. I could see the structure in statistics and teaching stats.
Stats is a piece of cake. It's got a couple of key concepts
and once you understand those you can figure out everything else.
It's really easy. So I thought, oh yeah, how can I show that
very simple structure. There's a series of steps that you
more or less have got to go through for, it's not formal,
it's not like a recipe, it's guidelines. But so I could
see this structure here, so I thought how can I show this structure
and I was reasonably good with Power Point, and I knew how to do
hyperlinks and it's no big deal, you go, format , hyperlink
or wherever it is on the menu, it's that hard. So I thought,
yeah, okay, I can do this. I'll make up a concept map of this.
I…knew about concept maps. I always, I like, my philosophy
in teaching is show students simple things then show them the details.
So structure. Show them the structure, the overall structure, then
get them to drill down if they need to, allow them to drill down
if they need to. So I made them a concept, I made a concept map
for Stats in a Day and it's what I used for running that workshop.
And then MSC120 came along this was after, remember when Rodney
Fountain died. He was unit chair and half way through the semester
I got lumped with it. Here it is yours. Well no one else would do
it so I just took it up and ran with it and I could see that we
were using a set of regular publisher type Power Point slides and
I thought well let's have a go at road mapping this one up
too. It took a couple of iterations. The first year that I did the
first version and it wasn't great. It took two iterations,
while I was just learning how to do it and I didn't have a
decent tool then. All of the, as I described before, those images
of slides on the parent, that was done initially, oh, but it was
awful. I used screen thief to dump them on there and then each one
of them to make images and each one then had to be manually linked
and the navigation had to be manually added and it took just that
physically doing it even without the intellectual input, just physically
very time consuming. It took about 20 hours per topic. Which is
about same as writing it. |
| Inter: |
When you talk about developing the approach, the
e road mapping approach and your doing it, something in, you know
training in Stats which you, you control that training session,
that material. When you move to something like Business Information
Systems and your talking about it's a big first year unit
and a big team of people and at that point Rodney too, probably
a very mature approach to teaching by distance education throughout
the faculty with a well developed printed study guide and printed
reader and computer conferencing and a prescribed text. How do you
then open this up and persuade, encourage people's commitment
to a new approach to it? And it sounds like a new approach, really,
to developing a kind of electronically based study guide as well
and moving away from the print one, so, well, how do you negotiate
that? |
| Carr: |
That came later. I developed the idea into 120 with
this big team of people. So I put together, in the first instance,
it was basically me doing, I ran MSC120. The first time I ran it,
it was basically me on my own. It was before, really, unit teams
had really got working all that well and then the unit team got
hold of it. Well they had a structure then and the interesting thing
is it seems that if somebody, an expert puts a structure down, there's
evidence from MSC120, that other people, if it's a good enough
structure and if it's not completely off the planet type structure.
If it's a reasonable structure of the unit. The unit team
can then take up ownership of the whole thing and have an input
into it by, well they can modify the structure a little bit if they
need to but they can add resources and that's what happened
in MSC120. We got buy in from the team by, okay, well here's
a general structure, what we need is a bit more information on this,
in this theme, we need a few more slides or we need some other resources
to build it, enrich it. And that's what happened with the
unit team. They have been through a fair few people now and, they,
it's wonderful to see. Bardo now, Bardo now and the team,
the team, they, it's their product, it's wonderful to
see. I was listening to Konrad lecturing with it the other day,
I was listening to one of his audio streams and he's talking
to the themes that are in the structure and like, he owns them,
they are his now because he's had input into all of them.
I made the first initial structure, but now it could have been anybody
that does it. I think it's anybody. You make, somebody makes
the structure and now the unit team can own it by enrichifying it
for themselves. |
| Inter: |
You mentioned other resources, Rodney and obviously
adding more Power Point slides which is text and images but in the
last couple of years the other resources have been audio visual
resources, when you talk about enrichment. So could you give us
some idea about what those resources were and how they were integrated
into the Power Point concept map. |
| Carr: |
They were, if you've got a theme, like, okay,
you open up a slide in a lecture theatre and the lecturer will tell
a story about it or they will describe something about a particular
concept or they'll expand on the definition or they'll
do a demonstration, maybe in Excel or something which is what the
Stats stuff was. There's always something on every slide that
the lecturer would add to. They might provide an interview, run
a movie of a particular business or an interview of a business leader
or somebody or wherever it's needed. Every slide in a lecture,
you can do that with and all we've been doing is capturing
those in various ways. A lot of them are audio files, video files,
demonstrations, word documents. Some of them are just printed word
documents. Somebody types the story in or a link out to a URL somewhere
else in the world and then you link them into the relevant slide
and now, all you're doing, you're putting them in, you're
adding extra resources and not, not be in Power Point and your adding
extra resources into your road map. So it's still, the road
map is still being, you know, it's still got the right structure
and everything, you're just enriching in at that level. You
can add those sorts of things in at a high level if you want to
give an overview of a topic or a lower level or even at course level.
Get the Dean in to say what this course is all about. |
| Inter: |
So Rodney, you're talking about the nitty gritty
of the use of the product and presumably most students, well,
the off-campus students get it free of charge and the on-campus
students can buy it at a modest cost so they get the CD Rom. But
you mentioned the nitty gritty of using it in the lecture, in the
classroom. It's clearly not a resource only designed for use
by the off-campus students. It's relevant to all students
doing these subjects. Now you mentioned how it's been shown
off in a lecture situation. Could you talk a little bit more about
how do you use the road map in lectures with the on-campus students?
You can talk about the undergraduate unit. You can talk about how
it's used at the postgraduate level. |
| Carr: |
Well, it is, it can be used, people, lecturers use
it in a couple of different ways. It seems people in lectures don't,
the initial reaction is to use them in a linear fashion still. Which
is fine, you can still do that. You've got a theme which is
typical lecture notes anyway. You've got the theme, then you've
got a series of slides that then expand on that. That structure
is still there, it's just presented in a hierarchical manner,
so you can, first time through we mucked it up and we didn't
have that structure underlying it and people got confused when they
were, staff got confused when they were using it in a linear fashion
through the lecture. But I've seen people, I think people
are now starting to use it in lectures in the more visual hierarchical
way, using the hyperlinks that are provided to continually reinforce
to students, here is the structure that we're working with.
So MSC120, I think the first slide that you come in at is the general
overview of the whole unit and if you're doing a particular
topic, week 5, topic 5, than you click on topic 5 and drill down
in lectures. Students use it the same way from the CD Rom for reviewing
or for seeing what's going to be covered in this weeks lecture. |
| Inter: |
That's interesting because I was almost going
to cut to the chase right then and ask you how do students use it?
You know, you've got on-campus and off-campus and you've
got particular cohorts with maybe, special learning needs as well,
maybe international students, how they might use it. You know what
do you pick up when you might use it in lectures, talking to students
in the corridor, office, tutes, online? What sense are you making
of the student experience of engaging with the road map, Rodney? |
| Carr: |
We haven't had a lot, we haven't had
any negative feed back for a start, so that's all looking
good but we haven't done really in depth interviews with
students or anything like that to find out how they're using
it. It seems that they're using it to, the idea is that they're
using, the anecdotal evidence is that they're using it to
get the big picture and drill down. It's like a, it is an
electronic study guide, so they're using it in the same way
that they use a study guide. One of the things that, kind of, when
you asked the question before about why e-road mapping. One of the
reasons for developing it in the first place, this came out after
I had started developing this, is when we were talking about the
unit teams, how they take up ownership of it. It is also a way of
a unit team, taking their existing resources, which is usually study
guide and readings and lecture notes and getting away from the traditional
study guide approach and what you can do, there's a couple
of things you can do. A unit team could do what like Greg Wood has
done and produce resources. Just enrich the unit by producing resources
and that's happened. I mean, lots of times that's happened.
There's a lot of examples around of producing resources. That
doesn't, I can see all of those happening, that was fine,
there's good resources and you can build it up that way, but
that still leaves the printed study guide and I thought, not the
printed study guide. You've got the two primary resources,
you've got the study guide and you've got the lecture
notes and they were sort of duplicating one another and you can
either take the study guide and ramp it up somehow, so you've
got all these extra resources and somehow link them in or you could
start off with the lecture notes and link in all the resources and
I could see these two things and I'm not much of a reader.
Right, I'm a very, I want to click on things and drill down.
So I don't like study guides. So I threw away the study guide,
well I didn't throw it away because you can link out resources.
But I started with the lecture notes and worked from them. I think
the more obvious approach is to start with the study guide and do
like what Richard did in MSC277. He took his more or less existing
materials and their still text based. He's just, that unit
he's htmlafied them and he's enriching things up by
starting from the text based enriching things. That will do but
it doesn't get the immediate impact, doesn't make it
visual instantly. It still looks text based. This way you
get something with a visual impact quickly. You start with your
lecture notes, you sexify them up, you make them look interesting
and exciting. The effect is you have got an electronic study guide
at the end, so the effect is the same, but it's just how you
get to that electronic study guide. Start with the lecture notes. |
| Inter: |
The road mapping in the study guide, it's sort
of focused on, you know, the subject matter, the what of the teaching.
But one thing that you did in extending, it might be a slight detour,
but extending the road map, was to try and road map the key components
of the teaching and learning environment for Business Information
Systems by trying to show the relationships between the subject
matter, the resources, online, the graduate attributes. So it was
a mapping of the learning environment. Would you sort of explain
a little bit about the logic of that Rodney? And embedded in that
was the road map of the subject matter but it was at this sort of
bigger picture level around the learning environment. What was the
logic? |
| Carr: |
The road mapping, what I've sort of talked
about so far is, the road mapping of the unit content, which is
what most lecturers are interested in and what happened in MSC120
is we could, there are other resources, like the online environment,
library, assignments, things like that, that link into that structure
as well. You want to combine them all into one structure. So what
we did in MSC120 is we didn't make that structure the unit
structure, the content structure, the first thing that they see.
We tried to map out the structure of the whole unit independent
of the content. Trying to relate, like you said,… |
| Inter: |
I should have mentioned assessment by the way which
is critical from a student perspective. I'm glad you picked
up on that one. |
| Carr: |
We've made assessment the key because that's
what most students are really interested in. Now that, we haven't
really pushed this. It's still road mapping, it's still mapping
of content, but I think it should develop into this higher level
one that we've never pushed. MSC120 has got that. It's
basically a screen that lives above the content that's got
a map of all of the resources, showing how, just what they all are
and describing them and then linking down to them and the key to that
was the assignments. There was, it hit them in the face, they were
the key thing because that's what most students are interested
in these assignments, so assignment 1, assignment 2, and the exam
or whatever and then that was supposed to link out to unit content
or to the library resources or to an online environment or we have
in MSC120 the online client for one of the assignments. So it was
supposed to be like that, now we've never pulled that one
off completely. That's not how at the moment they're
being used in most units. They're taking the standard content
and richifying that up using road mapping and then adding resources
so they haven't got to that, but in MS, what we're doing
in MPC701 this time, which is the postgraduate version of MSC120.
MPC701 and Tanya Castleman and myself we're teaching it this
time, plus some tutors and she could see the structure and that's,
she figures it, she uses it, I have seen her now, she went through
it first time, she went through it with this linear stuff. I've
seen her now. She'll go down and start using the navigation.
So she understands the structure. But she is amazing at coming up
with things to engage students. Now I'm not particularly good
at that. Other people are a lot more imaginative at that. Tanya
is a good one. So what she and I are doing, is every week we take,
we aren't running lectures every week, we don't need
lectures every week with these rich resources on the CD Rom and
all the students have got the road map, so we don't have to
spend so much time actually lecturing we only have, we only basically
have a lecture every other week. Just a two hour lecture and we
group the concepts. So last night we talked about hardware. So what
we've done each week is we've taken the structure and
taken the slides out of the road map and added in colour coded slides.
We make them clear that these aren't in the road map. These
are activities and we've added in, oh, there will be things
like, how might you use this tool in business, or can you think
of an example of using this particular methodology to develop an
information system that you might have used in business or some
of them are a lot more specific. Like, here is a spread sheet with
some data in it. How might be a better way, we would put that up
on the board, what might be a better way of, or show me some problems
with the way this data is organised? So we're leading them
down to the road of, instead of doing it in a spreadsheet use a
database. So we've got a lot of activities that we do in a
lecture, a big lecture theatre, it seats 200 and there's interaction
in the lecture theatre and we've built that into the road
map. Now the first time through, cause we're doing it on the
fly and we're both really busy, we're actually pulling
the slides out of the road map and making a separate set of Power
Point slides for the lectures but I, I worked last couple of days,
when I just was putting the last one together I did the reverse
and put those colour coded slides, those slides that show this is
something to do guys this is interaction guys, but you've
got to do this, we do the same thing with the tutorials, link the
tutorials into the road map, rather than the other way round. So
it's, it's I think we will solve that problem. |
| Inter: |
But it's really an interesting evolution Rodney,
when you talk about the basic information concept mapped in text
and still images, moving to multimedia to enrich the presentation
of the stuff, the subject, to then show the linkages between the
key components of the teaching and learning environment and then
to move into activity and interaction. It's almost the final
step in the evolution of the whole approach. |
| Carr: |
It was never planned out this way. I'm not
a very good planner and I'm not very good at seeing where
things are going to end up. I don't know that anybody is actually,
but I'm particularly not good at it and I take advantage of
opportunities when they present themselves. So Tanya, just building
in her bit of interaction it's amazing to see, that happens
accidentally, it links in to them. |
| Inter: |
You've got another person involved beyond the
undergraduate team but in a sense able to talk the talk of educators
in Information Systems, so you're still with your immediate
disciplinary colleagues. I'm sort of interested in your work
now with colleagues in other disciplines. Now you've done
work with the economists, now you're stepping beyond your
immediate collegiate group of your discipline field and beginning
to engage with other people on the concept and they must add other
things as well to the model or the thinking, Rodney. Tell us a bit
about that. |
| Carr: |
Yes, certainly. The economists; that was a second
year unit that they mapped out. It was pretty much the same actually,
that was the same idea. Economics has got concepts and you drill
down, it was really an easy one, in inverted commas, easy one to
road map. We're doing, sitting down doing one. But the thing
that they brought to it was, well one of the things, they brought
lots of stuff, they brought their expertise for a start. They saw
it as a problem solving tool. Very interesting. They saw students
using this to solve problems. Now I never saw it as that. I saw
it as, well here's how you, well I guess I did when you think
about it, cause those steps in the Stats one were, How to solve
a stats problem. Any way they saw that, they saw it really, not
as presenting information at all, they saw it as, here is an assignment
for you students, you have to do that, here is how you can use the
information to help solve the problem that you've got to solve
and that's just a different slant on it. They, it was quite
impressive to see them. They didn't have the tool initially.
They were doing it by hand and they did a lot more text based linking
and they came up with quite a good structure but they did it by
text based hyperlinks. I showed them how to do that and they didn't
go down the visual road and right at the end, I sat down for a few
hours with each one of them because they all did separate topics
and then we worked as a group to put them all together into a, we
spent a morning basically putting the whole structure together and
making it visual in the end. Doing the visual road mapping all came
together very quickly. I've seen that now with other units
as well. I've worked with a few now. It's only early
days yet. They're, people are doing it on their own but I've
seen, it's really the same thing. They'll take a set
of Power Point slides, look for common themes and start grouping
them together. I forgot to mention a good thing with this visual
presentation of a concept map, they are visual any way, but doing
them for students in Power Point, it's not just circles and
arrows. You build pictures out of the concepts and the common, you
group the concepts usually, so the visual effect is important. You
group your slides, like if you've got little sub themes you'll
group them. If you've got one that's talking about something
slightly different you'll move it off to the side and so can
you see the initial visual thing I'm talking about? |
| Inter: |
Yes. |
| Carr: |
At time, a lot of things can be presented over time.
The history and development of ah, the software package is what
I picked last night. It had a beautiful time line, obvious time
line, obvious way of structuring the information on a parent slide,
you structure your childs, your children on the parent on along
a time line or you present ah, concepts usually build on one another
so you build them in that sequence. Though, now this is the MAE201
economics team saw this, that the developer, the academic, the teacher
puts the, they present the structure and in a way they can add arrows
and things like that to show students in which order they should
do the slides but students don't have to do it that way. They
can skip topics. They don't have to drill down if they don't
want to. They say, oh I don't need to know about that yet
or I know about that topic, I'm going to skip to the next
one. They have got the freedom to do that. I didn't ever.
When I'm doing lectures, I'll do that all the time,
I'll skip whole themes and say, like I did last night. I don't
want to talk about input devices in any detail. They can go and
look that up in the text book or look it up with the details in
the road map itself. In the lecture I just skip those slides. Just
went down to the parent of input devices and just said, oh you can
just look that up yourself and went back up to the parent of that
one and then on to the processing. How a computer processes stuff.
So it was, students do that as well, they skip, they can skip themes
if they want, they can skip whole concepts if they want to and the
MAE210 team saw that as a pretty important flexibility that this
whole concept mapping allows for students. |
| Inter: |
You've got this bigger vision or ambition to
try and develop a road map for the complete undergraduate commerce
program. What is that about? |
| Carr: |
I think you can road, I'm sure you can road
map whole courses. The idea, we're doing it in, that's
the BCom. It's called the Commerce road map and the idea is,
again for students to show them the whole course, an overview of
their whole course. Now they've got overviews already… well they've got some overviews. If you go look in the Handbook
or look it up …or wherever you look it up online. You can,
you get majors, you get the Dean, a message from the Dean saying
what the course is all about. So they get some structure already
but they don't get the nitty gritty detail. So this is the
idea. You take your BCom and you drill down, you see the themes,
oh, here's an accounting major or here is a marketing major
or here is an IS major and you can drill then down to your unit.
That's the content. The actual aim, that's done. That
is more or less in the handbooks any way, that structure, that's
the majors and the discipline groups but what's most interesting
about the BCom road map was mapping out not the content, not the
specific content of units but generic skills. Now that's much
harder to show in individual units, unless individual units are
about team work ah, it will be harder to get that in at the unit
level. So at the course level though what we are trying to do is
show to students a theme, a concept is,…, graduate attribute,
generic skills, right. That's one theme. This is important
in your course. You're are going to learn about all sorts
of generic skills. What are they? And you drill down and oh, here's
a list o 20 or so whatever there are generic skills, like team work,
communications skills, writing skills, oral presentation skills,
problem solving skills, creativity. I mean you know what I mean.
There's a big long list of generic skills. You then drill
down even further. Let's look at presentation skills, so you
go down to, into communication skills, drill down even further into
presentation skills. Now what you see there is at the bottom level,
when you get down to the drill down you see a list of, now the idea
is, we haven't quite pulled this one off, there's no
resources or very few resources are actually at this level in this
road map. What it does is only point off to existing resources and
the existing resources are on the whole, the resources, the activities
and the assignments, whatever they are in the existing units. So
at that level you drill down, all the way down to oral presentation
skills. We might have a few resources there like, what's it
all about, learning objectives, what you should be able to do, a
student should be able to do by the time they graduate. They
should be able to do a half hour presentation structure well, all
that sort of stuff. There might be, we have got check lists at that
level. We've got maybe self review tests, that sort of stuff
but the main thing if you want to learn students, if you want to
see how these skills are going to be developed across your degree,
here are the units where there are some activities, or some assessment
or it's taught or discussed or maybe in tutorials wherever,
it's discussed in MMH299. It's discussed in whatever
other units work with oral presentation skills which are not very
many. I picked on a bad example there because that's probably
at the moment, one unit. Writing skills, report writing skills,
that's developed in many units across the whole course. So
there'd be a, you know that matrix there, there's a
matrix of common, a matrix with down the side are all of the attributes
and across the top are all the units in the course and for each
one of them you give a score of how much each one, each unit, contributes
to oral presentation skills say. Then you add up your rows to get
a total for each skill. That's a fairly, there's nothing
wrong with that, it's a good first cut at quantifying how
the skills are developed and showing you how the skills are developed.
The road map, BCom road map is a visual version of that matrix with
a little bit more detail, rather than just a three or a two or something
describing for students how their skills are developed across the
whole course. |
| Inter: |
Rodney, I guess finally, and there are many threads
that can be pulled together, many threads indeed but I think it's
always interesting for those of us who have got the opportunity
of observing our teenage children using technology at the ages of
15 or 16 to speculate on what they're going to bring to university
education not too far down the track and we're talking about,
well it is now and it'll only going to get stronger and I
think your talking about younger people, you know, being immersed
in video games, the visual you've mentioned, ipods, mobile
phones, the internet, the web to get critical breaking information
and use DVD's. This is their world and many things you've
said in the whole interview, I guess form a view about the emerging
higher education student and the best way of facilitating their
learning or teaching them. I just sort of wonder whether you might
be able to reflect on much of what you've said in terms of
some key observations about the changing nature of students and
of teaching in higher ed. and the types of teaching and learning
environments we've got to create and run, including digital
environments to give them a very good education into the future |
| Carr: |
Students now days, we were brought up with TV too,
and that sort of visual, rather than, as I said before, I'm
not a great reader and I think that all that's happening now
is we're seeing more and more students coming through that
are not great readers. They are much more visual. They want to listen
to things, they want to watch things. They want to experience things,
rather than just sitting and reading it. I find it difficult to
read. There are still voracious readers around, thank God, I'm
not one of them though, unfortunately and I think a lot of our students
are like that now. So a lot of this came from internal and I could
see this is how I am. I won't pick up text books and read
them either, students won't, a lot of students are like that.
That's what they're like now, they'll play computer
games and that's just what people are brought up like. It's
not everybody but it's certainly more people, we're
seeing more people like that. We've just got to cater for
them and give them learning resources that are more suited. A lot
of the Hot Copy simulations, now that's really a very important
tool. Now those types of things are really critical because that's
what students will want. They will want to click on things and if
it looks like a game they might use it and they might actually learn
something but we can't do a Hot Copy in 320 units across Business
and Law. There's, we just can't do it, we haven't
got the resources. Give us 20 years and we might be able to do it
but we can't do it now. This road mapping gives a quick, like
it is quite quick, I think like I think we're doing MAA201
and I've estimated it's going to take 2 days, 2 full
days to road map up a unit and make it look interesting. Make it;
it's not really doing an awful lot to the content, we're
not playing with the content we're just making it look sexy
for students, well in many ways. I think we can do it in 2 days.
We can make an electronic study guide with links, you know, all
working, so it looks good in 2 days. Now that's, Hot Copy
type. It's nothing like a Hot Copy but it's something
that we can role out across a lot of units quickly and make them,
I wouldn't do it with all units. You asked the question before
that I don't think I answered, the question; is this appropriate
for all units? I don't think it is but it's dammed close
to all units. All units have got a structure. Road mapping is a
quick way of providing, getting, rolling out all of the units quickly
in a form that is not a huge change in content but it's making
it look something interesting and different for students. It's
a bit of a market, I think it might have a marketing role to play.
If we could roll out a BCom road map. All universities have got
the same structure, the same information, the same units. Everybody
knows about generic attributes, it's nothing new. If we can
make it look new we might attract some more students. Now, international,
not domestic students, international. We have got to have something
to give them, a CD Rom. Here have a CD Rom, this is your course
if you come to Deakin University, here is your course, here's
a road map, here is a CD. Give them a buck, you know. I'll
produce 2 million of these things if that's what it's
going to, it's not an expensive operation to produce these
CD Roms and hand them to all high school kids or hand them out at
international recruitment drives or give them to the agents to hand
out. Whatever is needed, I think they might have, it's just,
it looks different from what other universities have got and we
can roll it out quickly for all units which is something that we
can't do Hot Copy with quickly. We'll do Hot Copy with
a slow link, that's great, that's much, much, much, richer
because you're adding simulations, really much richer, and
all the extra files, the audio files, the video files, all that
sort of stuff. They take a lot of effort to do, they are; you can
do them slowly. Another thing that this road mapping does is once you've got the structure, if you want to call it quits
and don't do a particular simulation or add in a link to a
particular video file or you haven't got the time
to make the files you don't have to do it. MAE201 has got
a very simple road map with basically no links to, that might have
a link out to an Excel file, I don't think they've got
one of those this time, that's next iteration, creating all
of that. We can get something out quickly to all, that covers many
units and makes them look interesting to students, I hope. |
| Inter: |
Thank you Rodney. |
| |
|
| |
 |
|