| An Interview with Mirjana Lozanovska |
| (“Inter” refers to the interviewer, “Mirjana” refers to Mirjana Lozanovska) |
| INTER: |
Mirjana, I'm interested in talking to you about
the CD Rom Contemporary Architecture and I know when you
gave a seminar on the CD you held up a printed reader and a CD and
you said, 'How did I get to this?' and you actually
spoke at length about your passion or love of learning about a subject
and your scholarly interests in the subject matter. So I wonder
whether you can take us on that journey of what were the origins
of getting to a CD and a printed reader for the subject? |
| Mirjana: |
I guess that I was very interested in developing a history unit
that was on our most recent period in that sense and I also that
and I suppose that means that the students kind of live in the period
that we are talking about but what led me to that was my own research
background and interest in the built environment as a thing that
mediates human dignity and I think human identity and I think we
underestimate how much of our sense of self at every level physical
and subconscious, sociological we get from our built environment
and our present built environment and so in order to form a discussion
around that I wanted to develop this unit and a couple of other
things I think were very, very important to understand the role
of history and theory in architecture was one of the bases of the
unit because we talk about the making of the world but in order
to make a better world history and theory integral to the discipline
of architecture because it's an understanding what kind of
world we have in terms of the built physical world. So I was especially
interested in developing a thoughtful and very grounded kind of
unit. So there's also and ethical position that I have and
that is that I really wanted to do a history unit that included
many parts of the world and the ethical position that it comes out
of my research about that sense of human dignity we all know that
the knowledge available to us is predominantly Western kind of narrative
and so one of my tasks and still proving to be an enormous challenge
is to find material of architecture and buildings in the non West
parts of the world and while interesting in more recent times there
is a bit more focus on Asia especially from the Australian prospective.
There isn't still much attention given to Africa, to the Middle
East, to Russia, to the bulk of South America and so forth. So that
was one of the agendas for the unit at a point of an ethical position. |
| INTER: |
When you mention that focus in the curriculum Mirjana,
I immediately think of the graduate attributes and providing an
international prospective in culture sensitivity and also one of
the key objectives of the teaching and learning plan relating to
internationalizing the curriculum. Those things are really easy
say in a policy sense, but I think there very difficult to actually
construct in your curriculum and teach effectively. Have you got
any further comment to make on how you actually see them in enacting
a more international curriculum and teaching in this subject? |
| Mirjana: |
Well the reason I said I can't believe that
I, we've achieved this, the LS team and myself the CD Rom
and the reader is in fact part of it took, I have to admit years
to actually develop the material for the unit and I don't
mean just the theoretical material that in some sense might have
taken less time but the images of buildings from other parts of
the world. What kind of projects? What did they look like? What
were those architects interested in? Were they similar or different
to other architecture and building in other parts of the world?
So just to find the visual material because I do have to say there
is a focus on visual material on the CD Rom, was in its self a huge
task and then of course getting the copyright for the images wherever
we could, trying to find friends and people that had taken these
photographs and used their photographs, architects, architecture
friends that have photographs of some of these building and being
able to use their photographs and wherever possible finding internet
images that we could get copyright of, because as you know it's
very difficult to get copyright on text images in books and so forth. |
| INTER: |
Now getting to the presentation of the material on
the CD Rom its self, I wonder whether you can paint a picture of
when you open up the CD, what do user students see? How have you
organised the images, the material? I know it's organised
schematically, how did you think through theme as a key basis for
organising the images? |
| Mirjana: |
Yes, when you open up the CD of course you get the
very gorgeous, Flash, exuberant introduction with music and then
me speaking but once you get into the unit then the unit is organised
around twelve themes. The main motive for that is a pedagogical
one where if we are talking about a period after nineteen sixty-eight
it's over, it's just over thirty-five years. Not an
incredibly long period and if we are talking about a kind of a pedagogical
position which want to include the whole world then it seemed that
themes were the way that the buildings and the theoretical material
began to organise it self through my analysis of it and so rather
than talking about the period between sixty eight and seventy eight
or something like that we talk about housing across those thirty
or so years, across the globe and what kind of changes that were
along those thirty or so years across the globe but also what similarities
and differences are there between a developing country for example
in relation to housing and a developed country and so the questions
that then emerge are thematic questions about that theme, the question
about housing emerges as a very large theme that is one way of defining
that period or one way looking at that entire period. |
| INTER: |
Now the other thing that really strikes you when
you open it up and look at the home page is assessment is up front
and the work that you want students to do is there in the assessment
requirements. Can you tell me little bit about how you go about
constructing the assessment regime for the unit? The types of assignment
tasks you set in regard to the engagement with the material on the
CD Rom. |
| Mirjana: |
Yes, there are basically three assignments for the
whole unit. I do have to say that there is a kind of triangular
structure to the unit. In that there are three components to each
theme. There are the theoretically text and a summary, then there
are the projects so that there is focus on real built work and there
is images of this work, key projects, as well as the summary for
it and the architects and you can actually browse through those
three components for each theme and then one might be off to another
theme because of a particular architect did another key project
in another theme so there's this sort of growth through the
use of CD Rom. So those three components. So the assignments relate
both directly and indirectly to those three components and trying
to find the links between them. So assignment one is a question
for each theme that the students have to do, twelve theme questions.
Now that basically enabled the students to focus on each theme and
to read the material for each theme and to look at the projects
and then demonstrate their understanding of it. So that's
a sort of thematic question but they don't necessarily have
to do it in order their submitted in groups of four and so forth.
The assignment two focuses on being able to look at more recent
material periodicals and journals because it a unit that talks about
a period after nineteen sixty eight there isn't a lot of text
books about it and so it's a lively dynamic unit in that your
looking at you know some of the most latest ideas and projects and
so forth. So assignment two is a focus on being able to research
through periodicals and journals and Internet sites and you will
find on the CD Rom direct web sites that we have filtered through
our periodical filtering kind of process for the students to link
up to. So in that assignment they might look at housing through
one journal and how that journal attended to reporting housing say
in a twenty-year period. They might look at one architect and how
that one architect was looked at across journals when that architect
practically prominent and so forth. So again that structure of three
becomes relevant and in the final essay it's quite a bit more
open that invariably the students love to choose the question on
doing an essay on a architect, on a particular architect and therefore
their able to choose the architect that they have a passion for
I suppose and that's and that in addition enables them to
bring that knowledge into their own design architect work, in depth
knowledge of a particular architect but their not meant to do a
autobiography of an architect, which there are many of. Their meant
to look at an architect through a practically framed and focused
analytical framework and there's some examples given in that
assignment. |
| INTER: |
Now one thing you did in dealing with each theme
is you had a short audio lecture or introduction. You did many of
them but a colleague did one or two. What was the purpose of doing
them? |
| Mirjana: |
I think in all of this it was an attempt for me to
translate what is typically a textural kind of unit, guide and unit
process into the digital format of a CD Rom and so what the CD Rom
enables us to do is have this multimedia kind of presentation of
the unit and I felt that one of the things of off campus students
often miss out on is the voice of the lecturer and their own interest
and potential inspiration about the unit and so I wanted to include
that little audio extract you know snip-it in order that student
are able also listen to an explanation of a particular theme, there
very brief but it does give them, there about, they range between
ten and fifteen minutes I think. It does give them a snip-it of
being able to sense a kind of a personal relation with lecturer.
For example or the speaker for a particular lecture and also everything
that comes with audio the tone, the kind of attention, the pauses
and so forth and so that gives it a kind of dynamic quality of interaction
with the off campus student. |
| INTER: |
So you're mentioning off campus student and
if we turn to the student experience of learning the unit and even
using the CD, how would you summarize the experiences of the students
engaging with a unit of this nature, how do you assess that? |
| Mirjana: |
They do respond to me especially when they first
receive the material, which they must think is minimal because they
just get one reader with one CD in the front cover so in that sense
it's a minimal package. There's no printed unit guide
and so forth and so I think at first they're a bit perplexed
as to where is the unit and so I've had comments in the first
week. I can't find the syllabus, so then I explain to them
it's in the CD and from then on, by the end of the semester
I then invariably had very positive feedback, but I also, very positive
feedback about the capacity to browse through the unit across those
various structural components of the CD and but also the richness
of the material and the image, the extent of the images there is
and so forth and projects and so that sort of realness of the, of
the unit has been commented on positively. But also asked the students
if they come across any hic-ups if something isn't quite right
on the CD or if there's just a human error that they tell
me about it then we can amend it on the next round. |
| INTER: |
And Mirjana how do you actually work with the printed
readings and the CD in term of your own classroom teaching for the
students studying on this campus? How do you integrate the two?
Your classroom teaching on one hand and the printed reading and
the CD Rom on the other. |
| Mirjana: |
Well I have to say the CD was first designed for
off campus material but since delivering it for the first time last
year, I have had positive feedback on it and then after giving that
presentation to the staff here, that I very much encourage my on
campus students to get a copy of it and they invariably use it to
go over a lecture, I mean the lecturers are two hours long and the
summaries not two hours but with the projects and so forth you know
they are able to go over it and especially any parts they are interested
in, in particular. So it enables them to in a sense to pursue their
own lines of passion about architecture through the CD and to allow
that to grow rather than it be limited to the lecture. Even though
I have to say that the lectures are an additional component that
can not be substituted for non lectures but they do work very well
together and the both on campus and off campus students have a book
for a reader, but the book is an anthology of essays. Its not written
by one person, there is no text book really for this unit and the
reason I did that, is that it includes the twelve essays students
have to read but it includes many other essays. So again they're
able to browse through that anthology of essays and follow there
own paths of interests and about this period of architecture. |
| INTER: |
When you are reflecting on the whole experience of
developing the CD and working with talented people in Learning Services
of course. What lessons do you think you have learnt Mirjana, what
would you pass on to your colleagues who might be interested in
doing this type of multimedia CD development? To me you're
very clear about nature of the curriculum and its structuring you've
accumulated a lot a images but what things would you advise on in
regard to the issue of particularly developing and producing a CD? |
| Mirjana: |
I think that having an incredibly talented team in
Learning Services and I will read out the names if I can Adrienne
Campbell, Jacqui O'Leary and Tony Neylan was more than I could
of imagined and their technical expertise as well as editing expertise
and so forth combined with my own content and my own pedagogical
position was in its self a kind of a very making a of potentially
a good CD Rom and a good unit and so forth, nonetheless each of
us was on a huge learning path to try and combine those two things
the best way possible and so I remember initially Adrienne and I
in order to formulate the template of the unit would sit down and
have these quite intensive discussions, both of us learning and
both us very, very interested but what came out of those is the
special format of a CD. Now I guess in some ways I'm lucky
in being an architect that I can have an understanding of a spatial
form of organisation more than some other people that might be purely
historians or purely business managers or so forth I don't
know or purely scientists so you know I'm sure the other disciplines
have also some kind of a sense of spatial but there is a spatial
organisation in the CD Rom it's not chronological the CD Rom
you don't go about it step one, step two, step three. We structured
the twelve themes one, two, three up to twelve but then from the
twelve themes you could go out to projects that might lead you to
architect, that might lead you to other projects by that architect.
So there was this very enabling capacity browse and therefore to
inspire self-learning. So that spatial organisation was something
that I think I can come to terms with right at the beginning does
help the translation of the textural material onto a CD Rom. The
other one is if it involves visual material to have that in a sense
more or less prepared before the production of the CD starts because
it does take an enormous amount of time and I think though the other
thing that helped me is very regular meetings between us because
we're obviously on the same campus and we were just 2 floors
up, we were able to ring each other on the spot and go down and
attend to the problem to enable the production to keep going. I
think the biggest hic-up though trying to timetable the production
of a CD to some how be convenient for both the Learning Services
people who have their own huge schedule of productions and academics
who have intensive work at some times during the semesters then
not between semesters. So I think that's the most difficult.
So if you can get that organised then it might be a smoother production
of it. I just wanted to add one more thing about the ethical position
and we talked about internationalisation of the unit and its content
and so forth. I have to say though I invariably I bring some of
that back to Australia by talking about architecture for aboriginal
communities, architecture immigrates communities and so forth. So
that sense of internationalisation that's beyond the Western
realm, the predominant global Western realm is brought back to our
local context so that relationship between the local and the global
is always played out and that is another very significant ethical
position that I hold on to. |
| |
|
| |
 |