| An Interview with Paul Turner |
| “Int” refers to the interviewer and “Turner”
refers to Paul Turner |
| Int:
|
Paul, I'm interested to talk to
you about your e-simulation development and if I could get the title
correct to begin with, Model for Interactive Decision-making Application
in Sport Management and it's called MIDAS. |
| Turner: |
That's correct |
| Inter: |
To get the overall context for the development of
MIDAS, I just wanted to talk to you first about the subjects you
teach in sports management and what their purposes are. |
| Turner: |
Well, Sport Management is one of the majors in the Bachelor of
Commerce. Now there's 6 sport-related units that we teach,
basically from a policy development unit through to an event management,
facility and event management units. And in between, there are a
couple of electives, a practicum as well as a sport marketing unit.
What we try and do is break them into core management units and
then more sport marketing related focus, so our introductory units
are essentially governance, the sports system, the Australian sport
system, sport in society, how it affects and impacts society, managing
sport in terms of how you can manage, coaches, athletes, sports
scientists and so on, and then we get into the specific areas of
sport facility management, sport project management which is an
event management unit and sport and the law. So they're our
core units that we teach. |
| Inter: |
And your particular units are in the area of event
facility management? |
| Turner: |
Yes I teach in the facility and event management
area and also in the sport marketing area in the postgraduate or
masters program. |
| Inter: |
And does MIDAS relate to those two areas or just
to the event and facility management subject at the moment? |
| Turner: |
As it currently stands it is only in the facility
management specifically unit. It's got some degree of cross-over
into the event management unit, but the way we've planned
or designed our focus towards MIDAS is to try and integrate it some
way to all our units if we could. And we believe there's the
capacity to link it into our sport organisation unit or our sport
and the law unit, whether it be in various modules or even as sort
of a holistic unit-wide type approach. For instance, we could take
a facility management focus on violence in stadia, and that could
link into a sport and the law unit or module of learning, so we
believe there's scope to develop it. At this stage it's
not being developed as broadly as that, but we do believe there's
scope to do that. |
| Inter: |
Now, sports management is taught on-campus only,
it's not officially taught off-campus. At the Burwood campus,
could you tell us a little bit about how you generally go about
teaching and assessing student learning in sports management, particularly
the units you teach? |
| Turner: |
Basically, we do undertake a series of different
mechanisms in terms of assessing students. Some of our early units
in particular we do run basic exams at the end of a semester. What
we try and do is have some level of applied learning associated
with most of our units. For instance in our event management unit,
we ask students to put together an event manual. So in groups of
4 or 5, they actually go through the process of constructing an
event manual from the bare basics right through to the end-point.
Now the only thing they don't do is actually deliver the event.
So they've got all the documentation in place relating to
all areas that are required for running an event, and that's
their operational areas, their marketing areas, administrative and
financial areas. And then they put that in a manual ready to go.
So someone could actually say, yes we could run this event. We don't
go that far, so we tend to do our assessment and I guess our learning
in lines of our basic yes, can you sit, complete the exam and pass,
through to, well, in a more applied sense, can you take the knowledge
that you have and learning that you have and actually present it
as you would to an organisation. |
| Inter: |
So in terms of this applied experiential learning
flavour to the teaching in part, and I know it will test your memory,
Paul, in regard to the origins of the e-simulation MIDAS, but can
you recollect and maybe elaborate on some of the key motivations
for wanting to do an e-simulation? |
| Turner: |
You are probably testing my memory now a little bit.
We felt that obviously there was, and still is, an impetus at Deakin
to move towards providing opportunities online to students. We currently
don't have to react too greatly in sports management at the
moment to that environment but it will move down that pathway. What
we felt was, we would, rather than just put, say, basic notes or
say a book online, what else could we do that would actually allow
students to again apply knowledge rather than just you know read
a study guide. So that was our motivation to look at it and say
yes the day will come when it may happen. We don't know, but
it will come, and we'll have to be in a position to deliver
to our students in a more online context so we thought well we would
like to be a little bit more pro-active about how we could do that,
how best we could do that and we started to think along the lines
of an e-simulation that again would allow that applied learning
to evolve. |
| Inter: |
Now the concept maybe wasn't a long time in
the making but I think that the building of the environment was
a fair time in the making. You ended up working with an external
web developer, how did you see the relationship and in a sense what
you're expected to contribute to the e-simulation, vis a vis
that of the web developer? |
| Turner: |
It was a very good experience from our point of view.
I think it helped that the developer had worked at Deakin and did
know the system and some of the conditions associated with the university
environment. From the point of view that, again, he was very realistic
about what could and couldn't be achieved as well because
we did go through a phase of some grand plans of full-on game type
simulation experiences and realised then the cost associated with
developing some of those things were prohibitive from our point
of view. But our developer was very reasonable, had a very good
concept and could work in with the idea also that we had. So we
went forward and said look, this is what we'd like to do,
can it be done and was very supportive in terms of saying yes it
can be done. So yes I'd say the experience was very good from
our point of view. |
| Inter: |
And in terms of the concept itself and I know it's
very difficult to paint the picture in words of how the MIDAS e-simulation
works and we can show that separately in the case, but can you provide
an overview of how the thing is structured maybe you know from a
student perspective. What does the student do when they get into
MIDAS? What's it all about? How does it work? |
| Turner: |
OK, what it is, obviously it's built at this
point around the facility management unit that our students complete.
What we've done is divided the unit into 6 core modules of
learning and each student is required to then come in and work through
those 6 core modules. The way we've integrated it into our
program, is we then have them in small groups working in each of
those modules, but they then have to present information relating
to one module specifically. So if we have say, 20 students, 24 students
in a class, there might be 4 students in each module, 6 modules,
each group will present in detail about one module, but every student
will work through all six modules. So as a student coming in to
experience it, what we do is we take them through a brief introduction
of MIDAS in the initial phase, we then give them a chance to have
a bit of a play with the simulation, have a look at it, see how
it works, see what it can provide and then we work through and say
ok next week you'll be starting Module 1 and we then work
through over a period of six to eight weeks through each of the
modules and it's done from our point of view in two parts,
one in the computer lab and the second part is then in a normal
tutorial room, where they then present some of their results, findings,
outcomes etc. |
| Inter: |
You've probably touched on this, Paul, in terms
of how you integrate it with a classroom teaching environment. A
lot of people see the technology as being primarily relevant to
off-campus teaching and learning or cross-campus. You're on
one campus, but you see the value of the e-simulation being embedded
in classroom teaching and learning. Have you got any other comments
to make about how you can make it work well? |
| Turner: |
I guess the fact that they can come in, they can
sit for an hour in a computer lab and work as a group is quite advantageous
from our point of view because they then take, as I say, move to
the next phase which is in a tutorial room. Could it still be done
completely off-campus? Probably yes, and it would still work and
in alliance with say DSO or various other components, it could still
be delivered probably fairly comfortably. What we tend to find,
though, is that the capacity to get them all together as a group
collectively is quite advantageous to them and to us to solve any
problems in an on-going capacity, rather than trying to do it by
email or solely by email, it means we know week-to-week where they're
at, so again we're not necessarily having to monitor that
in another fashion and we can do it collectively rather than doing
it with 24 students individually. So we know that six groups, four
people, where are you at, at this point in time, so it's been
quite useful. |
| Inter: |
In terms of the students' experiences of using
the technology, I guess the advantageous thing is that you're
actually there on the spot and you're observing them interacting
with the technology. What are some of the things you've been
observing, I mean what do students say, do they verbalize their
experiences of working with the technology? What's your sense
of their experience of it? |
| Turner: |
They certainly do verbalize it. I mean I guess we
get extremes from 'I can't get back in or log back in',
right through to 'this is great that we can actually go and
have a look at certain websites or wherever they might end up going'.
The good thing though I think that has come through, it has given
them a chance to at least pin down their group members, because
group work can tend to be very, very difficult to undertake in a
student environment, gives them the chance to do that. It's
a different level of motivation also because it's not the
same old tutorial that they're going into and that becomes
one of the key comments that we often get, is yes this is different
and therefore it's a little bit more interesting. Even if
they're not enamoured with the simulation or the web, access
or anything else, they seem to tend to be very mindful of the fact
that yes, at least it's different to what we normally do. |
| Inter: |
Paul, you can beaver away in your own nook and cranny
and think you're doing quite good things in technology. I
know you've had an opportunity to show MIDAS externally to
your own sports management fraternity or professional associations,
what's been the feedback or reaction there beyond Deakin? |
| Turner: |
Very, very positive but again but we haven't
really got to the next stage of perhaps sharing it more broadly
with some of these people. But most people have been very positive
and very enthusiastic about it, in terms of their response. We've
showcased at a Sport Management Australia-New Zealand conference
and also a North American Sport Management conference and on both
occasions, received quite a number of people coming up afterwards
and saying, look we'd love to know more about this, how can
we integrate or initiate some of this in our own programs and so
on. We haven't got to the stage yet where we could comfortably
get it out beyond, say, our boundaries at this point of time but
there's certainly been quite a degree of interest and I guess
in the main the interest also has been from people who have been
experimenting or tinkering with the same sorts of things, not necessarily
the MIDAS experience but with the e-learning environment. They tend
to be the ones who are most receptive, most enthusiastic. |
| Inter: |
In terms of reflecting on what you've done
to date and maybe thinking about the possibilities of the future
and getting over some other things to do with PhD's completed,
do you have a sense of where you might take it and e-learning more
generally in sports management within the university? |
| Turner: |
As I've said already, our idea initially was
to certainly broaden the concept across our units that we offer,
and I think we would still like to do that if the opportunity allowed
us to do so. We always had an intention that if it could be successful
in the Deakin environment, is there either an opportunity to make
it a little bit more commercially available or at the very least,
even is there the capacity to perhaps share in some way with other
universities. So that was always the intention even say, some four
or five years ago. Yes, I think we would still like to move down
both of those pathways, to say yes, how can we integrate it in the
broader sense with our other units and how can we also perhaps share
or commercially develop for use you know in a broader sense. |
| |
|
| |
 |
|