Publications
Excessive Judicial Intervention
Matthew Groves
(2021), pp. 1-29, Australian Bar Review, Sydney, N.S.W., C1
The Return of the (almost) absolute statutory discretion
Matthew Groves
(2020), pp. 129-147, Interpreting executive power, Sydney, N.S.W., B1
Matthew Groves
(2020), Vol. 100, pp. 60-78, Australian Institute of Administrative Law Forum, Canberra, A.C.T., C1
Bail in extradition proceedings
Matthew Groves
(2020), Vol. 44, pp. 298-319, Criminal law journal, Sydney, N.S.W., C1
The iceberg of Australian administrative law: justice before and beyond judicial review
Matthew Groves, Greg Weeks
(2019), pp. 1-11, Administrative redress in and out of the courts: essays in honour of Robin Creyke and John McMillan, Sydney, N.S.W., B1
Does one rotten apple spoil the whole barrel? Bias in multi-member decision-making
Matthew Groves
(2019), pp. 235-254, Administrative redress in and out of the courts: essays in honour of Robin Creyke and John McMillan, Sydney, N.S.W., B1
Matthew Groves
(2019), pp. 202-216, The coherence of statutory interpretation, Alexandria, N.S.W., B1
Rights, rhetoric and reality: An overview of Rights Protection in Australia
Matthew Groves, J Boughey, Danial Meagher
(2019), pp. 1-16, The Legal Protection of Rights in Australia, Oxford, Eng., B1
International law, administrative powers and human rights: The legacy of Teoh
Matthew Groves
(2019), pp. 103-122, The Legal Protection of Rights in Australia, Oxford, Eng., B1
A reasonably reasonable apprehension of bias: CNY17 v minister for immigration and border protection
Matthew Groves
(2019), Vol. 41, pp. 383-395, Sydney law review, Sydney, N.S.W., C1
Matthew Groves
(2019), Vol. 40, pp. 641-665, Adelaide Law Review, Adelaide, C1
Reforming Judicial Review in Tasmania
Matthew Groves
(2019), Vol. 38, pp. 1-33, The University of Tasmania Law Review, Hobart, Tas., C1
Administrative Redress In and Out of the Courts; Essays in Honour of Robin Creyke and John McMillan
Matthew Groves
(2019), pp. 1-282, Administrative Redress In and Out of the Courts; Essays in Honour of Robin Creyke and John McMillan, Sydney, A7
Modern administrative law in Australia: Concepts and context
M Groves
(2019), pp. 1-447, Modern Administrative Law in Australia: Concepts and Context, A7
Ombudsmen and prisons: reviewing and reforming
M Groves
(2018), pp. 319-336, Research handbook on the ombudsman, Cheltenham, Eng., B1-1
Judicial review and human rights
M Groves
(2018), Vol. 25, pp. 64-78, Australian journal of administrative law, Rozelle, N.S.W., C1-1
A life without hope - the Victorian Charter and parole
Matthew Groves
(2018), Vol. 42, pp. 353-371, Criminal law journal, Rozelle, N.S.W., C1-1
The principle of legality in Australian and New Zealand law - final observations
D Meagher, M Groves
(2017), pp. 258-268, The principle of legality in Australian and New Zealand law, Annandale, N.S.W., B1-1
Administrative justice without lawyers? Unrepresented parties in Australian tribunals
M Groves
(2017), pp. 346-372, Administrative justice in Wales and comparative perspectives, Cardiff, Wales, B1-1
Interpreting the effect of our charters
M Groves
(2017), pp. 2-21, Australian charters of rights a decade on, Annandale, N.S.W., B1-1
The second charters of prisoners' rights
M Groves
(2017), pp. 187-201, Australian charters of rights a decade on, Annandale, N.S.W., B1-1
The principle of legality and administrative discretion: a new name for an old approach?
M Groves
(2017), pp. 168-188, The principle of legality in Australia and New Zealand, Annandale, N.S.W., B1-1
The principle of legality in Australian and New Zealand Law - final observations
D Meagher, M Groves
(2017), pp. 258-268, The principle of legality in Australia and New Zealand, Annandale, N.S.W., B1-1
Legitimate expectations in Australia: overtaken by formalism and pragmatism
M Groves
(2017), pp. 319-344, Legitimate expectations in the common law world, Oxford, Eng., B1-1
The legitimate expectation as an instrument and illustration of common law change
M Groves, G Weeks
(2017), pp. 1-15, Legitimate expectations in the common law world, Oxford, Eng., B1-1
The unfolding purpose of fairness
Matthew Groves
(2017), Vol. 45, pp. 653-679, Federal law review, Acton, A.C.T., C1-1
The reform of military justice
A Duxbury, M Groves
(2016), pp. 1-12, Military justice in the modern age, Cambridge, Eng., B1-1
The dissent of Murphy J in ACF v Commonwealth - the first modern view of public interest standing?
M Groves
(2016), pp. 189-208, Great Australian dissents, Cambridge, Eng., B1-1
The legitimacy of expectations about fairness: can process and substance be untangled?
M Groves, G Weeks
(2016), pp. 165-187, Public law adjudication in common law systems : process and substance, Oxford, Eng., B1-1
The common law principle of legality and secondary legislation
D Meagher, M Groves
(2016), Vol. 39, pp. 450-487, University of New South Wales law journal, Sydney, N.S.W., C1
Interpreters and fairness in administrative hearings
M Groves
(2016), Vol. 40, pp. 506-546, Melbourne University law review, Melbourne, Vic., C1-1
Public comments by judges of their colleagues: an unhappy Australian episode
M Groves
(2016), Vol. 8, pp. 98-128, Journal of media law, Abingdon, Eng., C1-1
A man for all seasons? The fair minded observer and royal commissioners
M Groves
(2016), Vol. 23, pp. 201-217, Australian journal of administrative law, Rozelle, N.S.W., C1-1
The evolution and reform of standing in Australian administrative law
M Groves
(2016), Vol. 44, pp. 167-199, Federal law review, Acton, A.C.T., C1-1
Substantive (procedural) review in Australia
M Groves, G Weeks
(2015), pp. 134-162, The scope and intensity of substantive review : traversing Taggart's rainbow, Oxford, Eng., B1-1
The power of an administrative tribunal to inform itself
M Groves
(2015), Vol. 22, pp. 236-252, Australian journal of administrative law, Rozelle, N.S.W., C1-1
Public statements by judges and the bias rule
M Groves
(2014), Vol. 40, pp. 115-147, Monash University law review, Clayton, Vic., C1-1
Do administrative tribunals have to be satisfied of the competence of parties before them?
M Groves
(2013), Vol. 20, pp. 133-151, Psychiatry, psychology and law, Abingdon, Eng., C1-1
Emailing judges and their staff
M Groves
(2013), Vol. 37, pp. 69-90, Australian bar review, Sydney, N.S.W., C1-1
Habeas corpus, justiciability and foreign affairs
M Groves
(2013), Vol. 11, pp. 587-621, New Zealand journal of public and international law, Wellington, N.Z., C1-1
Reviewing reasons for administrative decisions: 'Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak'
M Groves
(2013), Vol. 35, pp. 627-654, Sydney law review, Sydney, N.S.W., C1-1
Exclusion of the rules of natural justice
M Groves
(2013), Vol. 39, pp. 285-318, Monash University law review, Clayton, Vic., C1-1
M Groves
(2012), Vol. 33, pp. 371-397, Adelaide law review, Adelaide, S. Aust., C1-1
Empathy, experience and the rule against bias in criminal trials
M Groves
(2012), Vol. 36, pp. 84-102, Criminal law journal, Rozelle, N.S.W., C1-1
The imaginary observer of the bias rule
M Groves
(2012), Vol. 19, pp. 188-201, Australian journal of administrative law, Rozelle, N.S.W., C1-1
Should we follow the gospel of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth)?
M Groves
(2010), Vol. 34, pp. 736-772, Melbourne University law review, Melbourne, Vic., C1-1
Should the Administrative Law Act 1978 (Vic) be repealed?
M Groves
(2010), Vol. 34, pp. 452-480, Melbourne University law review, Melbourne, Vic., C1-1
M Groves
(2010), Vol. 33, pp. 87-121, South Asia: journal of South Asia studies, Abingdon, Eng., C1-1
Funded Projects at Deakin
No Funded Projects at Deakin found
Supervisions
Dakshina Chandra
Thesis entitled: Next Generation of Legal Services: A Regulatory Landscape for Optimizing Futuristic Technologies
Doctor of Philosophy, Law